I know, I still owe everybody Tater Trot Tracker times for the last two days of the season (including big home runs like the one Buster Posey hit Sunday afternoon). I had a very busy weekend (including my first trip to Lambeau Field and my first NFL game yesterday) and I have a couple of busy nights ahead - including tonight's on-a-special-night podcast with Bill and The Common Man from Platoon Advantage. Hopefully, I'll be able to get these last two Tater Trot Tracker posts up tonight, but they might just have to wait until Wednesday or Thursday. I'm sorry for that.
One thing I didn't want to wait any longer to put up - because we've already waited way too long to see it - is an update on the predictions contest I ran at the start of the season. If you remember, back in March/April, I asked anybody interested to feel out my MLB Predictions form to enter into the contest. The winner at the end of the season would get 2 Free Tickets to any 2011 baseball game*!
(*Actually, a $30 gift certificate to either MLB.com or the team of their choice, which should be theoretically enough for two tickets.)
The form asked for division finishes, team victories, playoff participants, and MVP/Cy Young/ROY award results. Point values would be assigned for the accuracy of each of these predictions.
I've been meaning to update everyone on the contest all year, but, since the leaderboard was based so much on team victories at the end of the season, I wasn't sure what to do. And then, as the season started to wrap up, I got too busy to tally the points. I'm making up for that now.
To see the leaderboard and everybody's full predictions, side-by-side, click here.
(Click "Read More" to continue reading.)
no commentsI'm going to be busy running errands all afternoon and evening, so the Tater Trot Tracker post for today is going to be delayed. I'll do my best to get it up some time this evening.
In the meantime, yesterday I participated in a discussion panel with Norman Einstein's, an online sports monthly, to talk about my thoughts on Ken Burns' "The Tenth Inning". Obivously, with my pieces on Tom Boswell and Jose Canseco earlier this week, I had some thoughts on the documentary. Click on over to Norman Einstein's latest issue to check out the discussion between Ben Birdsall of There Are No Fours, Brian Blickenstaff of Touch And Tactics, Drew Fairservice of Ghostrunner On First and Walkoff Walk, Patrick Truby of There's No "I" In Blog, and yours truly.
For other takes on "The Tenth Inning", I recommend Bill over at the Platoon Advantage and Jeff Polman (of Funky Ball fame) at Seamheads. Good stuff from those two.
no commentsI just wanted to follow up the post I wrote last night - "What current HOFer did Tom Boswell see mix a "Jose Canseco milkshake"?" - with some additional thoughts on the "milkshake" and the alleged HOF PED-user. Thanks to Rob Neyer and Craig Calcaterra, there has been a pretty decent discussion around the web about the piece and who the HOFer may or may not be. There's also been plenty of talk about how a milkshake isn't a very viable means of steroids ingestion - and, that, in fact, a milkshake (sans steroids) would be a very normal and legal thing for someone to take who was trying to bulk up through a weight-lifting regimen.
Everyone makes good points, and I'm not disputing anything. As I said in the post, Boswell's claim, and the way in which it was said, could very easily be inaccurate, imprecise, or just plain incorrect. A ten-second sound byte isn't enough evidence for anything. I only wrote the piece because it seemed pretty clear to me that Boswell felt like he was admitting steroids use by a Hall of Famer, even if it did come out imprecisely. If what he was trying to say was true, I wanted to figure out who the candidates could even be, since we don't have too many post-Canseco Hall of Famers.
"Jose Canseco milkshake" is not new
Looking around the web, I quickly realized that the "Jose Canseco milkshake" phrase is not new. Here's a book published in 1993 where they call the phrase one of the best insults in the history of the game. Boswell first mentioned the phrase back in 1988, when he made his very first accusations against Canseco. It clearly meant "steroids"; there's no confusion about whether these were shakes designed to increase mass or not.
Here's a quote from the October 5, 1988, edition of the San Francisco Chronicle:
(Click "Read More" to continue reading.)
no commentsI'm posting this early because I didn't want to wait to talk about Jay Bruce and the Reds. The Slowest and Quickest Trots will be up later today (though I sincerely doubt anyone's beating Bruce in the "quick" department...).
Home Run of the Day: Jay Bruce, Cincinnati Reds (Trot Time: 16.92* seconds) [video]
Now this is how you celebrate a walkoff win. I suppose it helps when you're walking off into the playoffs...
On the first pitch of the ninth inning, in a game the Reds were losing 2-1 into the sixth inning, Jay Bruce electrified a crowd of thirty-thousand Cincinnati fans who had been waiting fifteen years to reach the playoffs. The ball caromed off the batter's eye in centerfield, but the game was over before that. Jay Bruce knew it the moment the ball hit the bat - sprinting out of the box with his hand raised without any hesitation. Houston centerfielder Jason Bourgeois knew it too, looking all but defeated as he watched it go over from the warning track. Bruce was running so hard that it felt like he was back at the plate by the time Bourgeois turned around.
I wish I could tell you definitively how fast Bruce rounded the bases. It's easily the fastest walkoff knock of the year. But with the huge crowd of teammates at the plate and the thundering crowd at Great American Ballpark, I just can't. Both camera crews - Houston's and Cincinnati's - changed to the crowd shot right as Bruce reached the plate, though the Reds crew did linger a bit longer than the Astros.
The 16.92 seconds is measured on that Cincinnati feed and, if you watch closely, you can see that they cut away right as Jonny Gomes starts to leap on the pile (he's the guy who runs out to the edge of the home plate circle as Bruce approaches the plate). In a later part of the six-minute highlight, when the broadcasters are showing a slow-motion replay of the home plate celebration, you can see that Bruce appears to touch home plate right as Gomes is landing on the pile. The official time, then, is probably a tiny bit later - maybe 17.0 or 17.5 seconds. The measure time of 16.92 seconds will do well enough, though.
And congratulations to the Reds and their fans. Doing the Tater Trot Tracker all year and watching 5,000+ home runs, I've grown to like quite a few of the Reds players (Scott Rolen, Chris Heisey, Joey Votto, Jay Bruce, etc.) because of the way they trot out their homers. It's fitting, then, that the biggest home run of the year comes from them and gives us such a memorable trot. Enjoy the playoffs.
(Click "Read More" to continue reading.)
no commentsUPDATE: Please see this post for some additional thoughts on the "Jose Canseco milkshake", including evidence that Boswell first mentioned it in 1988.
PBS finally aired the first part of "Ken Burns' Baseball: The Tenth Inning" earlier tonight. If you don't think I watched it, you're crazy. I enjoyed it for the most part. It seemed more fair and straightforward than I thought it might be when it came to the more controversial topics, especially steroids. But there was one moment that stood out to me more than any other.
During the steroids segment, Washington Post writer Thomas Boswell - who, if you don't already know, was the first person to connect steroids to Jose Canseco, if even in the most superficial ways - gave this quote:
"There was another player now in the Hall of Fame who literally stood with me and mixed something and I said "What's that?" and he said "it's a Jose Canseco milkshake". And that year that Hall of Famer hit more home runs than ever hit any other year.So it wasn't just Canseco, and so one of the reasons that I thought that it was an important subject was that it was spreading. It was already spreading by 1988."
Thomas Boswell seems to be telling us that he has first-hand knowledge of a current Hall of Famer using steroids. Who might that Hall of Famer be?
Well, if we take Boswell at his literal word, this is what we need to look for: someone who is already inducted into the National Baseball Hall of Fame and who hit more home runs than he ever had before after Jose Canseco arrived in the league. Canseco won Rookie of the Year in 1986, so we'll start there even if it makes more sense to use 1988 as the starting point.
The second part of the statement confuses me some. I can't tell if he's trying to say that the milkshake story comes from the 1988 season, or if he's adding the 1988 date as more of a clarifying detail (in effect, saying "Here's a story of how it was spreading - which it started doing in 1988"). Let's keep the search as wide as possible, but keep the 1988 year in mind.
With those criteria, we get a short list of eight Hall of Famers (assuming pitchers like Goose Gossage and Nolan Ryan don't count). Here they are, in increasing order of who I think is most likely to be Boswell's milkshake-drinker:
(Click "Read More" to continue reading."
no commentsTim Lincecum believes the balls in Colorado are juiced. That the Rockies are secretly giving the visiting teams balls that have not been properly kept in the stadium's humidor in order to increase offense. He's so sure of this, in fact, that, during a game last week, he received a ball from the umpire and, after saying loudly to himself "f*ckin' juiced balls", he asked the umpire for a new one. When pressed about it by the media after the game, he did not back down.
Heath Bell is also sure that the Rockies are messing with the balls. In fact, he thinks that they "cheat". On Sunday, Bell tweeted a message saying "SF are the nice people." A follower of his on Twitter interpreted from this that he was saying that the Rockies were cheating and, when he asked Bell if that's what the tweet meant, Bell said "yes they do."
That should solidify it then, right? Two star pitchers on two different teams are both absolutely certain that the Rockies are cheating - manipulating the balls that are put in play for their own advantage. So certain, in fact, that they're even willing to talk about it in public. These are men who are on the field of play. If anyone could be said to be experts on the topics, it's these guys. It's certainly not us bloggers in our mother's basements, or even the old guys in the press boxes. Our speculation is meaningless compared to the authority of the guys who play the game.
The ballplayers know the truth, and we would be foolish to ignore them.
Except, of course, that's ludicrous. For some reason, everyone seems to want to defer to the expertise of the ballplayers when it comes to these things. Is David Eckstein a great player? His teammates seem to think so, so it must be true. Should we be using machines like Questec to help review umpires' performances? Curt Schilling says no, therefore it's got to be wrong. Instant replay? BatGloves? Bigger helmets? Stupid ideas all - the players tell us so!
(Click "Read More" to continue reading.)
no commentsThis afternoon, I went to the final home game of the season for the Brewers. Behind two home runs by Ryan Braun and a solid performance from Chris Capuano, the Brewers went out on top 7-1. It was an interesting game to watch as a fan. Not only did we get to see Braun hit two home runs by the third inning (thus securing a third straight season of 100+ RBIs), we all saw Lorenzo Cain hit his first career home run, Chris Capuano pitch in his final start in Miller Park as a member of the Milwaukee Brewers, Trevor Hoffman walk out to Hell's Bells for the last time in his career (in what was almost certainly his final appearance in a Major League Baseball game), and Prince Fielder make his final appearance as a Brewer in front of the home fans. There were ovations galore.
All of that is worth a post of it's own, so look for that later in the week. What I wanted to talk about here was another "final" that I witnessed today: the final sausage race of the year. It being a Sunday, the sausage race was a relay race between the regular sausages and a group of "mini-sausages" - little kids dressed in smaller sausage suits. The mini-chorizo ("el chorizito", if you will) legged out the final half of the race to give the Chorizo his 15th victory of the year. In those 15 Chorizo victories, the Brewers ended up with an 8-7 record, becoming only the second of the five sausages this year to inspire a winning record from the Brewers.

The only other Racing Sausage to herald a Brewers win in a majority of his races was the Bratwurst who, in 11 racing victories, inspired the Brewers to a 9-2 record.
How in the world do I know this? Earlier this season, I used the power of Google and Twitter to go backwards through the season and find out who had won the Sausage Race on any given night. That gave me the definite winners of all but two games this season (June 10 and June 22). After that, I just followed Twitter on a nightly basis to find the winners and keep the standings updated (I have to give a big "thank you" to Bob Brainerd, the Brewers blogger from Fox Sports Wisconsin, who very helpfully announced the Sausage Race winners every night over on Twitter @fswbrainerd).
For those Brewers fans who, like me, are just dying to know how well the team did under their particular favorite sausage's banner, I compiled a nifty little calendar. Click on the image above to be taken to the 2010 Milwaukee Brewers Sausage Race Standings, where Italian and Polish fans can argue over which of their favorites helped the team more.
After all, Brett Wurst's 9-2 record as a racer is no less meaningful than Felix Hernandez's 12-12 record as a Seattle Mariner...
no comments








